PREGNANCY AND SKELETAL TUBERCULOSIS

¹ The Black Notley Hospital, Brainiree, England

The case histories of these Black Notley patients show that no serious harmful effects have been caused by pregnancies going to full term. Most of the patients had normal confinements; Caesarian sections were few and were usually done for obstetric reasons, not for fear of reactivation of the disease. This experience bears out a remark made to me by Marcel Galland. When asked if Caesarian sections were required for women who became pregnant after treatment at Berck for skeletal tuberculosis, he replied: "Jarnais! Tout passe!"

Two patients in the series had artificial abortions, and one aborted spontaneously. Two of these three patients did not do as well as other patients whose pregnancies went to full term.

Quite another question is whether the onset of skeletal tuberculosis sooii after pregnancy may be attributed to the pregnancy. In a group of women of child-bearing age, it would be difficult to distinguish between post hoc and propter hoc in considering this question. One patient of this series, H. Q. (Case 25), was admitted eight months pregnant with active tuberculosis of the knee; but pain in the joint had started fifteen months before admission, and the onset of disease no doubt preceded the pregnancy. Some of the patients admitted to Black Notley were mothers of young children hut there is no note of any pregnancy having preceded the onset of tuberculosis by a short interval. The follow-up reports of the married patients compare favourably with those of the unmarried.

Further, it may be argued that pregnancy increases resistance to tuberculosis. Such a belief was current from the time of Hippocrates until the middle of the nineteenth century, and clinical evidence can be quoted in favour of such a view. In America, Lyman (1943) followed up 1,818 women who had been treated for tuberculosis in a sanatorium; many had married despite medical advice to the contrary. Lyman found that the late results of treatment were four times as good in the married patients as in the single women. Lyman says, "When we consider that the married group established this record in spite of the fact that 192 out of 315 gave histories of pregnancies (averaging 2·25 children each), it is clear that some factor not yet accounted for has exerted a profound influence in their cases."

I have speculated elsewhere as to what this factor may be (Wilkinson 1949). But it seems clear that increased sterol circulation in the body is associated with increased reticulo-endothelial activity (Fraser 1935). Thus reticulo-endothelial proliferation has been observed in the lesions of lupus following the administration of calciferol (Dowling, Gauvain and Macrae 1948). An increase of blood cholesterol is found during pregnancy. The sex hormones are sterols and might be expected to be raised in the marital state; it is perhaps significant that marital contacts form a group relatively immune to tuberculosis.

There would appear to be good grounds for reassuring the married woman who has suffered from skeletal tuberculosis regarding the prospect of normal pregnancy. Many letters received from patients in a follow-up of this sort are poignant documents. There is no doubt that the majority of these women desire children as ardently as normal women, and that a safe confinement following skeletal tuberculosis is an excellent form of rehabilitation.