Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Watson-Jones, R.
Right arrow Articles by Le Vay, A. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Watson-Jones, R.
Right arrow Articles by Le Vay, A. D.

MEDULLARY NAILING OF FRACTURES AFTER FIFTY YEARS

Reginald Watson-Jones 1; J. Crawford Adams 1; J. G. Bonnin 1; H. Jackson Burrows 1; Thomas King 2; E. A. Nicoll 3; Ivar Palmer 4; Frederick vom Saal 5; Hugh Smith 6; David Trevor 1; O. J. Vaughan-Jackson 1; ; and A. D. Le Vay 1

1 London
2 Melbourne
3 Mansfield
4 Stockholm
5 New York
6 Memphis, Tennessee

One hundred and sixty-four cases of intramedullary nailing of the long bones have been studied with special reference to the difficulties and complications encountered.

There was one death not attributable to the method.

Two cases of pulmonal fat embolism and one case of thrombosis occurred, all in fractures of the femur.

The lessons we have learned from our mistakes can be summarised as follows:

1 . The method requires technical experience and knowledge and is not suited to inexperienced surgeons or surgeons with little fracture material at their disposal.

2. Intramedullary nailing should only be used in fractures to which the method is suited. In general, comminuted fractures or fractures near a joint are unsuitable.

3. Open reduction is preferable to closed methods.

4. The nail should never be driven in with violence. It should be removed and replaced with a new one if difficulty is encountered when inserting it.

5. In fractures of the femur the nail should be driven in from the tip of the trochanter after careful determination of the direction.

6. The nail should be introduced only to the level of the fracture before exploring and reducing the fracture.

7. Distraction of the fragments must be avoided.

8. If the nail bends it should be replaced by a new one, at least in femoral fractures.

9. If union is delayed, the fracture should be explored and chip grafts of cancellous bone placed around it.

10. Improvised nails or nails which are not made of absolutely reliable material should never be used.

11 . Make sure that the nail is equipped with an extraction hole for removal.






(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General