Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tudway, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tudway, R. C.

THE PLACE OF EXTERNAL IRRADIATION IN THE TREATMENT OF OSTEOGENIC SARCOMA

R. C. Tudway 1

1 Bristol United Hospitals

The foregoing suggestions may be summarised in the following recommendations for the treatment of osteogenic sarcoma.

1. Deep x-ray therapy in high dosage, followed by local resection, should be given serious trial especially: 1) in the upper limb; 2) in the group with atypical clinical or radiographic signs, or histology resembling that of inflammatory lesions; 3) with Grade I histology; and 4) in the young.

2. Deep x-ray therapy followed at once by amputation should be used for osteogenic sarcoma if : 1) local resection would leave a lower limb more unstable than an artificial leg ; or 2) if response to x-rays is poor.

3. Deep x-ray therapy alone should be used: 1) if the patient is unsuitable for, or refuses, any operation ; and 2) palliatively, if metastases are present or the tumour is too advanced, or the patient is not fit for radical treatment.

4. Amputation alone should be used palliatively, for pain or fungation, when x-ray therapy has failed to relieve, or is not readily obtainable.

5. Biopsy and histological grading must be performed in every case. A histological diagnosis is most important. Coley (1949) and MacDonald and Budd (1943) support this view.

6. The records of every possible case should be sent to and discussed by a group with special experience of these tumours.






(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General