Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Price, C. H. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Price, C. H. G.

PRIMARY BONE-FORMING TUMOURS AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP TO SKELETAL GROWTH

C. H. G. Price 1

1 The Pathology Research Laboratory, University of Bristol

1. Analyses are presented of comparable groups of the two commonest bone-forming tumours—osteochondroma and osteogenic sarcoma—derived from the following sources: Bristol Bone Tumour Register; British Empire Cancer Campaign Annual Report (1949); Stocks and Barrington (1925); Meyerding (1927); and Geschickter and Copeland (1949).

2. From this study, the following features emerge as characteristic and common to both tumours. 1) Both tumours are commoner in the male during the age periods 0-34 years, and over fifty years, with the possible exceptions of tumours of the humerus during early life and tumours of the pelvis. 2) The male preponderance is most marked for the appendicular long bones. 3) The male preponderance is greatest during the age period 15-34 years. 4) In the separate bones, these tumours tend to arise at a somewhat earlier age in the female. 5) In both sexes both tumours tend to arise at an earlier age in the bones of the upper arm and shoulder girdle than in those of the lower limb and pelvis. 6) Both tumours are related to an aberration of endochondral growth in length of bone.

3. The greater growth of the male, and differences in skeletal development in the two sexes, offer a simple and reasonably consistent explanation of these peculiarities and make it possible to discern the interplay of the three factors of age, sex and site of origin of the tumour.

4. From this concept it is possible to make a crude estimate of the factors of time and bulk of tissue which when combined may well account for the observed male preponderance of these tumours, and their anatomical distribution.






(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General