Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Yeoh, C. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, R. D., Jun.
Right arrow Articles by Yeoh, C. B.

LUNATE AND PERILUNAR DISLOCATIONS

Rolla D. Campbell Jun. 1; Eugene M. Lance 1; ; and Chin Bor Yeoh 1

1 The Combined Fracture Service of the Hospital for Special Surgery and the New York Hospital and the Trauma Service of the Roosevelt Hospital

1. A study of fifty patients with dislocations of the lunate bone or perilunar dislocations has been made. The period of observation was adequate in thirty-eight.

2. The injuries generally occur in young or middle-aged men after unusually severe trauma.

3. Associated injuries are frequent, and the most common of these is damage to the median nerve.

4. In one-third of the cases the nature of the lesion was not initially diagnosed or the initial treatment was inadequate.

5. A dislocated lunate bone may be replaced even at a late stage and even if the displacement is severe so long as there is some soft-tissue attachment. The anterior approach may safely be used for the replacement.

6. The lunate bone may be removed without involving the necessity for arthrodesis of the wrist.

7. Open reduction should be employed for trans-scaphoid dislocations whenever exact realignment and good fixation cannot be achieved by closed methods.

8. Excision of the proximal row of the carpus gives the possibility of salvage of a reasonable degree of function, and may be preferable to arthrodesis or removal of only part of the proximal row.






(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General