Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Joint Replacement Instrumentation Limited (JRI) Ad
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dooley, B. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dooley, B. J.

INLAY BONE GRAFTING FOR NON-UNION OF THE SCAPHOID BONE BY THE ANTERIOR APPROACH

B. J. Dooley 1

1 Melbourne, Australia

Cancellous inlay bone grafting for delayed union or non-union of the scaphoid bone gives good results in most cases (Table IV). The operation is easy, does not require radiological control and does not damage the dorsal arterial plexus. The indications for the operation are twofold: firstly for patients complaining of disabling symptoms in the wrist joint with an established pseudarthrosis of the scaphoid bone, with neither arthritic changes nor severe avascularity of the proximal fragment; and, secondly, for delayed union in recent fractures despite adequate immobilisation. Union may still occur if conservative treatment is continued further, but because this may take up to eighteen months (during which time most patients would be unable to work), operation is a reasonable alternative.

In this series two scaphoid fractures united after operation with some collapse of the proximal fragment. This probably resulted from removal of too much bone (preliminary to inlaying the graft) from an already small fragment with a poor blood supply.

The operation can be performed even in the presence of a small proximal fragment and gave a satisfactory result in two out of three such cases.






(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General