Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Joint Replacement Instrumentation Limited (JRI) Ad
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Urist, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Adams, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Urist, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Adams, T.

CARTILAGE OR BONE INDUCTION BY ARTICULAR CARTILAGE

Observations with Radioisotope Labelling Techniques

Marshall R. Urist 1; and Thompson Adams 1

1 Bone Research Laboratory, Division of Orthopaedics, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles; Los Angeles, California, United States of America

1. Isografts of articular cartilage of young rats, with mucoproteins labelled with 35S, extracellular fibrous proteins labelled with 3H-glycine, and nuclei labelled with 3H-thymidine, were transplanted into the anterior chamber of the eye.

2. Thin split-thickness transplants of the cells of the gliding surface of immature articular cartilage induced the formation of fibrous tissue.

3. Thick transplants and subsurface slices of immature articular cartilage, containing germinal cells of the epiphysial cartilage, induced the formation of new bone consistently within 4 weeks.

4. Full-thickness transplants in articular cartilage from senile rats induced only the formation of fibrous tissue.

5. Slices of growing cartilage, devitalised by cryolysis, or extraction of acid-soluble proteins, produced scanty deposits of bone or cartilage, or both, but only infrequently and generally after a lag phase extending from six to twelve weeks.

6. Reduction in the amount of mucoprotein in the cartilage matrix by papain, and suppression of the resynthesis of tissue proteins by cortisone, retarded but did not prevent bone induction.

7. Bone induction is the product of a series of interactions between inducing cells and responding cells by intracellular and intercellular reactions too complex to characterise in physico-chemical terms at this time.






(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General