Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bargren, J.
Right arrow Articles by Swanson, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bargren, J.
Right arrow Articles by Swanson, S.
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 60-B, Issue 2, 256-261
Copyright © 1978 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery


Articles

Mechanical tests on the tibial components of non-hinged knee prostheses

JH Bargren, WH Day, MA Freeman, and SA Swanson

Cadaveric knees replaced with the Geomedic, ICLH, Marmor and Total Condylar prostheses were tested in axial compression, in rotation and in hyperextension in order to observe the strength of fixation of the tibial components. In axial compression the strengths at failure varied widely, both with any one prosthesis and between prostheses. This is attributed largely to the strength of the cancellous bone of the tibia, which was measured in each case and also varied widely. Three natural knees failed at loads of 7300, 7600 and 8300 newtons respectively, whereas the strengths of replaced knees ranged from 3000 to 15750 newtons. At least one example of each design failed at less than 7300 newtons, suggesting little or no reserve of strength. The strength of fixation was greater when the tibial prosthesis was large enough to rest on the whole cross-section of the tibia. In rotation the three prostheses embodying rollers in troughs were stiffer than the Marmor which had a nearly flat tibial-bearing surface. The presence or absence of the cruciate ligaments had a negligible effect on torsional stiffness. In hyperextension, knees replaced with the ICLH, Marmor and Total Condylar prostheses failed by rupture of the posterior capsule at moments of about 60 newton-metres, compared with about 100 for natural knees. With the Marmor prosthesis the anterior cruciate ligament was avulsed at about 20 newton-metres compared with about 75 in natural knees, suggesting that in this respect the retention of the cruciate ligaments contributes little. None of the four knees tested after inserting a Geomedic prosthesis showed strengths as high as those replaced with the other three designs.




(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General