Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dobbs, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dobbs, H.
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 62-B, Issue 2, 168-173
Copyright © 1980 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery


Articles

Survivorship of total hip replacements

HS Dobbs

The survivorship of total hip replacements in patients operated on at the Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital has been analysed using standard actuarial methods. Between 1963 and 1972 173 metal-on-metal prostheses of various developmental designs were inserted. Between 1969 and 1972 248 prostheses of one design using a metal femoral component and plastic cup were used. The patients were surveyed retrospectively and for each the actual follow-up period was determined as well as the eventual outcome. The criterion of "survival" was that the prosthesis was still in situ and all such prostheses were regarded as "survivors", regardless of whether the patients experienced pain or loss of function. The survivorship was then determined by constructing life tables. The results indicate that for metal-on-metal prostheses the overall probability of survival was only 53 per cent after 11 years and the average annual probability of removal, irrespective of cause, was 5.5 per cent. The results were better for metal-on-plastic prostheses with figures of 88 per cent after eight years and 1.5 per cent respectively. For both prostheses the predominant reason for failure was loosening and the annual rate of removal for loosening increased as the follow-up time increased, suggesting that loosening was a wearing out process. The advantages of the survivorship method of analysis as compared with conventional methods are discussed.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
P. J. Yates, B. J. Burston, E. Whitley, and G. C. Bannister
Collarless polished tapered stem: CLINICAL AND RADIOLOGICAL RESULTS AT A MINIMUM OF TEN YEARS' FOLLOW-UP
J Bone Joint Surg Br, January 1, 2008; 90-B(1): 16 - 22.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
S. Hook, E. Moulder, P. J. Yates, B. J. Burston, E. Whitley, and G. C. Bannister
The Exeter Universal stem: A MINIMUM TEN-YEAR REVIEW FROM AN INDEPENDENT CENTRE
J Bone Joint Surg Br, December 1, 2006; 88-B(12): 1584 - 1590.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General