Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, I.
Right arrow Articles by Walder, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, I.
Right arrow Articles by Walder, D.
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 64-B, Issue 2, 239-242
Copyright © 1982 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery


Articles

Intra-osseous phlebography and intramedullary pressure in the rabbit femur

IH Thomas, PJ Gregg, and DN Walder

Intra-osseous phlebography and the measurement of intramedullary pressure (IMP) have been used clinically and in experimental animals as qualitative methods of measuring blood flow in the bone. The normal phlebographic appearances in long bones are not clearly understood and the correlation between these appearances and the IMP is not known. The distal femora of 10 anaesthetised rabbits were cannulated percutaneously. The IMP was measured and phlebography performed by injecting a radio-opaque dye (Conray 280).The mean resting IMP was 33 millimetres of mercury with a range of 7 to 81 millimetres of mercury. The rate of elimination of dye from the marrow varied from less than 1 minute to 40 minutes. There was no correlation between the rate of elimination of dye and the IMP. Variation in the medullary phlebographic appearance and in the routes of drainage were noted. We concluded that the wide range of resting values for both techniques suggest that neither is a true measure of blood flow in the bone and that the results of research or clinical investigation using these techniques should be viewed with caution.




(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General