Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Joint Replacement Instrumentation Limited (JRI) Ad
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bayston, R
Right arrow Articles by Milner, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bayston, R
Right arrow Articles by Milner, R.
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 64-B, Issue 4, 460-464
Copyright © 1982 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery


Articles

The sustained release of antimicrobial drugs from bone cement. An appraisal of laboratory investigations and their significance

R Bayston and RD Milner

The release of gentamicin sulphate, sodium fusidate and diethanolamine fusidate from Palacos and CMW cements was studied using elution and serial plate transfer tests. Further tests were made to assay the drug remaining in the cement after antibacterial activity could no longer be detected by the above methods, to detect the sustained slow release of the residual drug, and to ascertain the mechanism of release. The results confirmed that the release of gentamicin sulphate could be detected for longer from Palacos cement than from CMW cement, but the opposite was true for sodium fusidate. Little difference was found in the case of diethanolamine fusidate. Comparison of elution and serial plate transfer tests, and of results of elution in buffers of different pH, demonstrated that the test method employed had a significant effect on the results, and the omission of details of methodology from some publications made comparison and evaluation of results difficult. Varying quantities of residual drug were found in cement from which antibacterial activity could no longer be demonstrated; further tests for sustained, slow release showed that the antibiotic did not remain fixed in the cement but was released at a rate too slow to be detected in the elution and serial plate transfer tests. It is concluded that antibiotics are released from the cement by a process of diffusion, but tests to determine the mechanism of diffusion were unhelpful. The theory of diffusion of drugs through solid matrices, and the clinical implications of the experimental findings, are discussed.




(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General