Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Paterson, C.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Paterson, C.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, R
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 65-B, Issue 1, 35-39
Copyright © 1983 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery


Articles

Osteogenesis imperfecta with dominant inheritance and normal sclerae

CR Paterson, S McAllion, and R Miller

Most patients with dominantly inherited osteogenesis imperfecta have blue sclerae and relatively mild symptoms. However, in a small group of families the patients have normal sclerae and this disorder has been classified as Type 4 osteogenesis imperfecta. This paper reports the clinical and radiographical features of 48 patients from 16 families with Type 4 osteogenesis imperfecta and compares the findings with those of the classical disorder with blue sclerae (Type 1 osteogenesis imperfecta). The two types are similar in usually causing a mild disease but with a wide range of severity, and in both types the rate of fracture declines in adolescence. There are, however, some significant differences apart from the colour of the sclerae. In Type 4 the first fracture more commonly occurs at birth, dentinogenesis imperfecta is more frequent than in Type 1 and bruising and nose-bleeds are less common. As in Type 1, the radiographic appearances of the bones may be normal. It is important that Type 4 osteogenesis imperfecta should be recognised because of the need for competent genetic counselling, because the management may be different from that appropriate for Type 1 and because it may be mistaken for idiopathic juvenile osteoporosis or child abuse.




(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General