Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shakespeare, D.
Right arrow Articles by Rigby, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shakespeare, D.
Right arrow Articles by Rigby, H.
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 65-B, Issue 4, 383-387
Copyright © 1983 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery


Articles

The bucket-handle tear of the meniscus. A clinical and arthrographic study

DT Shakespeare and HS Rigby

A retrospective series of 272 operatively proven bucket-handle tears of the meniscus has been studied to define the natural history of the tear and to assess the accuracy of arthrography as a diagnostic technique. A simple twist, or a sporting injury accounted for most tears in the 196 patients on whom information was sufficient to allow analysis. There was, however, either no known trauma or merely a history of crouching in 20 per cent of patients. These were distributed evenly throughout the age range. Most of the 272 patients presented either with a locked knee (43 per cent) or with a history of locking (37 per cent). Fifty per cent of those with a previous history of locking but who were clinically unlocked at the time of operation, had displaced bucket-handle tears, indicating that unlocking of the knee joint frequently represents anterior extension of the tear, rather than relocation of the displaced fragment of meniscus. Significant meniscal tears were identified in 77 per cent of the 187 arthogram reports that were studied. Most errors in diagnosis seemed to occur when the separated fragment was hidden in the intercondylar notch and the peripheral rim was misinterpreted as an intact meniscus.




(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General