Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MacEachern, A.
Right arrow Articles by Heyse-Moore, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MacEachern, A.
Right arrow Articles by Heyse-Moore, G.
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 65-B, Issue 5, 582-583
Copyright © 1983 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery


Articles

Stable intertrochanteric femoral fractures. A misnomer?

AG MacEachern and GH Heyse-Moore

Intertrochanteric fractures of the femur are usually classified into stable and unstable groups, partly to predict the likelihood of displacement with early weight-bearing after internal fixation. Of 82 internally fixed intertrochanteric fractures which would normally be classified as stable, 25 subsequently underwent impaction along the axis of the nail or screw; varus displacement occurred in another six. Of these 31 fractures, 10 were two-part fractures which had been anatomically reduced, and 12 were originally undisplaced. It did not seem possible to predict the subsequent instability from the pre-operative radiographs. Of the 82 fractures, 47 had been treated with a Jewett nail-plate and 35 by a Richards compression screw-plate. Two groups of stable fractures were recognised: Group 1 was undisplaced and Group 2 displaced. Axial impaction occurred in a quarter of all Group 1 fractures however treated. In Group 2 fractures it occurred in a quarter of those treated with a nail-plate, and in over a third of those treated with a sliding screw-plate. The six fractures that underwent varus displacement had all been treated with Jewett nail-plates. Penetration into the joint occurred in 10 patients, all of them in the group treated with Jewett nail-plates; four required re-operation.




(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General