Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Levack, B
Right arrow Articles by Hobbs, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Levack, B
Right arrow Articles by Hobbs, S
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 67-B, Issue 3, 416-419
Copyright © 1985 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery


Articles

Results of surgical treatment of patellar fractures

B Levack, JP Flannagan, and S Hobbs

Sixty-four patellar fractures treated either by internal fixation or by patellectomy were reviewed retrospectively from 3.5 to 10.1 years (average 6.2 years) after operation. Results were assessed subjectively and objectively. Of the 64 patients, 45% had a good result, 27% fair and 28% poor. On the whole, patellectomy produced better results (60% good, 20% fair, 20% poor), than internal fixation (31% good, 33% fair, 36% poor). Nevertheless, the best results of all were achieved by precise anatomical reduction of the patellar fracture and fixation with K-wires and a tension band. Where this could not be achieved, however, patellectomy gave the best results.




(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General