Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by De Bastiani, G
Right arrow Articles by Trivella, G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by De Bastiani, G
Right arrow Articles by Trivella, G
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 68-B, Issue 4, 545-549
Copyright © 1986 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery


Articles

Limb lengthening by distraction of the epiphyseal plate. A comparison of two techniques in the rabbit

G De Bastiani, R Aldegheri, L Renzi Brivio, and G Trivella

We have compared, in rabbits, two techniques of limb lengthening by distraction of the epiphyseal plate using a unilateral external fixation frame. In all cases, 14 mm of symmetrical lengthening without deviation was achieved. With rapid distraction at rates of 1 mm per day (distractional epiphyseolysis) separation of the epiphysis from the metaphysis occurred by day 7, and by day 70 almost complete ossification of the cartilage and the elongated segment was evident. In contrast, slow distraction at 0.25 mm every 12 hours (chondrodiatasis) produced hyperplasia of growth cartilage without any evidence of detachment at 28 days, the end of the distraction period. By day 70 the epiphyseal plate had returned to normal thickness with normal cellular morphology, while the lengthened segment was occupied by ossified tissue. The significance of these findings is discussed.




(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General