Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Patterson, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Patterson, M
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 69-B, Issue 3, 374-380
Copyright © 1987 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery

Articles

Ring uncemented hip replacements. The results of revision

M Patterson

Since 1964, 3573 uncemented Ring total hip replacements of all types have been performed; 194 (5.4%) have required revision for infection, loosening or breakage. Of these, 102 were available for review; 81 had satisfactory results five years after operation. These results are better than many of those reported after revision of cemented hip replacements. It is suggested that the absence of cement makes revision easier because bone erosion rarely occurs.




(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General