Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hede, A
Right arrow Articles by Sandberg, H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hede, A
Right arrow Articles by Sandberg, H
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 74-B, Issue 1, 118-121
Copyright © 1992 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery


Articles

Partial versus total meniscectomy. A prospective, randomised study with long-term follow-up

A Hede, E Larsen, and H Sandberg

Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.

Two hundred patients with a meniscal lesion were peroperatively allocated to partial or total meniscectomy in a random manner. The results were compared at one year and at 6.3 to 9.8 years (median 7.8). After one year more patients with partial meniscectomy (90%) than with total meniscectomy (80%) had no complaints. At the later review these figures were 62% and 52%, respectively (p = 0.18). However, patients with partial meniscectomy had higher functional scores. The deterioration in function between the first review and the second showed no significant difference in the two treatment groups. The incidence of mediolateral instability rose from 8% to 47% and was more frequent after total than after partial meniscectomy. Between the two reviews the radiological signs of knee degeneration increased with no difference between the two treatment groups.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
I. D. McDermott and A. A. Amis
The consequences of meniscectomy
J Bone Joint Surg Br, December 1, 2006; 88-B(12): 1549 - 1556.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General