Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Joint Replacement Instrumentation Limited (JRI) Ad
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Galasko, C.
Right arrow Articles by Morris, P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Galasko, C.
Right arrow Articles by Morris, P
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 74-B, Issue 2, 210-214
Copyright © 1992 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery


Articles

Spinal stabilisation in Duchenne muscular dystrophy

CS Galasko, C Delaney, and P Morris

Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, England.

Of 55 patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy offered surgical stabilisation of the spine, 32 accepted and 23 refused. We compared both groups pre-operatively and at six-month intervals in respect of survival, forced vital capacity, peak expiratory flow rate and severity of scoliosis. In the nonoperated patients, the forced vital capacity deteriorated by a mean of 8% per annum; in the operated group it remained static for 36 months and diminished slightly thereafter. Spinal stabilisation resulted in an improvement in the peak expiratory flow rate which was maintained for up to five years. In the nonoperated patients the scoliosis progressed from a mean of 37 degrees to a mean of 89 degrees at five years; in the stabilised spines it was improved from a mean of 47 degrees to a mean 34 degrees at five years. There was significantly improved survival in the patients who had undergone spinal stabilisation.




(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General