Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Joint Replacement Instrumentation Limited (JRI) Ad
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosson, J
Right arrow Articles by Schatzker, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rosson, J
Right arrow Articles by Schatzker, J
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 74-B, Issue 5, 716-720
Copyright © 1992 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery


Articles

The use of reinforcement rings to reconstruct deficient acetabula

J Rosson and J Schatzker

Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

We reviewed 64 patients in whom 66 acetabula had been reconstructed with either the Muller ring (46) or the Burch-Schneider anti-protrusio cage (20) at a mean follow-up of five years. Five hips had been revised a second time for loosening, all after a Muller ring had been used for a medial segmental defect (2), ungrafted cavitary defects (2) or after resorption of a block graft (1). The use of bone grafts with the implants reduced the incidence of failure from 13% to 6% and of circumferential radiolucent lines at the bone-implant interface from 39% to 2%. The Muller ring is indicated for acetabula with isolated peripheral segmental defects or cavitary defects confined to one or two sectors. The Burch-Schneider cage should be used for medial segmental defects, extensive cavitary defects and combined deficiencies. Defects should be reconstituted with bone graft rather than cement.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
B. G. Ochs, U. Schmid, J. Rieth, A. Ateschrang, K. Weise, and U. Ochs
Acetabular bone reconstruction in revision arthroplasty: A COMPARISON OF FREEZE-DRIED, IRRADIATED AND CHEMICALLY-TREATED ALLOGRAFT VITALISED WITH AUTOLOGOUS MARROW VERSUS FROZEN NON-IRRADIATED ALLOGRAFT
J Bone Joint Surg Br, September 1, 2008; 90-B(9): 1164 - 1171.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
F. A. Carroll, D. A. Hoad-Reddick, R. M. Kerry, and I. Stockley
The survival of support rings in complex acetabular revision surgery
J Bone Joint Surg Br, May 1, 2008; 90-B(5): 574 - 578.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
K. Kawanabe, H. Akiyama, E. Onishi, and T. Nakamura
Revision total hip replacement using the Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device with morsellised or bulk graft: RESULTS AT A MEAN FOLLOW-UP OF 8.7 YEARS
J Bone Joint Surg Br, January 1, 2007; 89-B(1): 26 - 31.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General