Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Joint Replacement Instrumentation Limited (JRI) Ad
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Lenthe, G. H.
Right arrow Articles by Huiskes, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Lenthe, G. H.
Right arrow Articles by Huiskes, R.

STRESS SHIELDING AFTER TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT MAY CAUSE BONE RESORPTION IN THE DISTAL FEMUR

G. H. van Lenthe, MSc1; M. C. de Waal Malefijt, MD, PhD1; and R. Huiskes, PhD, Professor, Biomechanics Section1

1 Institute of Orthopaedics, University of Nijmegen, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Correspondence should be sent to Professor R. Huiskes.

Inadequate bone stock is often found in revision surgery of femoral components of total knee replacements. Our aim was to test the hypothesis that these remodelling patterns can be explained by stress shielding, and that prosthetic bonding characteristics affect maintenance of bone mass.

We made a three-dimensional finite-element model of an average male femur with a cemented femoral knee component. This model was integrated with iterative remodelling procedures. Two extreme prosthetic bonding conditions were analysed and gradual changes in bone density were calculated.

The long-term bone loss under the femoral knee component resembled clinical findings which confirms the hypothesis that stress shielding can cause distal femoral bone loss. Our study predicts, contrary to clinical findings, that an equilibrium situation is not reached after two years, but that bone resorption may continue. This hidden bone loss may be so drastic that large reconstructions are needed at the time of revision.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
R. B. Abu-Rajab, W. S. Watson, B. Walker, J. Roberts, S. J. Gallacher, and R. M. D. Meek
Peri-prosthetic bone mineral density after total knee arthroplasty: CEMENTED VERSUS CEMENTLESS FIXATION
J Bone Joint Surg Br, May 1, 2006; 88-B(5): 606 - 613.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General