Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chehade, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Nawana, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chehade, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Nawana, N.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS OF STIFFNESS AND STRENGTH CHANGES IN FRACTURE HEALING

M. J. Chehade, MB BS, Orthopaedic Registrar1; A. P. Pohl, FRACS, Director of Trauma1; M. J. Pearcy, PhD, MIEAust, CPEng (Biomed), Professor2; and N. Nawana, BE (Hons), MMedSC, Research Officer1

1 Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Level 4 Bice Building, Royal Adelaide Hospital, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia 5000.
2 School of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, GPO Box 2434, Brisbane, Queensland 4001, Australia.

Correspondence should be sent to Dr M. J. Chehade.

In the assessment of fracture healing by monitoring stiffness with vibrational analysis or instrumented external fixators, it has been assumed that there is a workable correlation between stiffness and strength. We used four-point bending tests to study time-related changes in stiffness and strength in healing tibial fractures in sheep. We aimed to test the validity of the measurement of stiffness to assess fracture strength.

At each duration of healing examined, we found marked variations in stiffness and strength. Stiffness was shown to be load-dependent: measurements at higher loads reflected ultimate strength more accurately. There was a biphasic relationship between stiffness and strength: at first there was a strong correlation regardless of loading conditions, but in the second phase, which included the period of ‘clinical healing’, stiffness and strength were not significantly correlated.

We conclude that the monitoring of stiffness is useful primarily in assessing progress towards union but is inherently limited as an assessment of strength at the time of clinical union. Any interpretation of stiffness must take into account the load conditions.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
T. Floerkemeier, C. Hurschler, F. Witte, M. Wellmann, F. Thorey, U. Vogt, and H. Windhagen
Comparison of various types of stiffness as predictors of the load-bearing capacity of callus tissue
J Bone Joint Surg Br, December 1, 2005; 87-B(12): 1694 - 1699.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General