Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Joint Replacement Instrumentation Limited (JRI) Ad
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boniforti, F. G.
Right arrow Articles by Benson, M. K. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boniforti, F. G.
Right arrow Articles by Benson, M. K. D.

THE RELIABILITY OF MEASUREMENTS OF PELVIC RADIOGRAPHS IN INFANTS

F. G. Boniforti, MD, Orthopaedic Registrar

Clinica Ortopedica I, Universita degli Studi di Milano, P. Cardinal Ferrari 1, 20122 Milano, Italy.

G. Fujii, MD, PhD, Senior Lecturer

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tohoku University School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-cho, Aoba-Ku, Sendai 980, Japan.

R. D. Angliss, FRACS, Clinical Fellow; and M. K. D. Benson, FRCS, Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon

Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre NHS Trust, Windmill Road, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK.

Correspondence should be sent to Mr M. K. D. Benson.

We have evaluated the reliability of the measurement of radiological indicators in developmental dysplasia of the hip. Three observers each independently assessed 60 pelvic radiographs from infants aged from 3 to 36 months. Errors from the true value of a single measurement made by a single observer (E1), of the average of two measurements by a single observer (E2), and of the average of two single measurements by two different observers (E3) were established for the acetabular index of Hilgenreiner, for the assessment of superior and lateral femoral displacement and for indicators of pelvic alignment.

The errors for the assessment of the acetabular index were E1 ± 5°, E2 ± 5°, and E3 ± 3.5°. There was a significant correlation between the presence of an acetabular notch on the radiograph and an increased error in measurement (p = 0.01). Yamamuro’s measurement of lateral femoral displacement was more reliable than the Hilgenreiner distance. The errors of indicators of pelvic alignment showed a correlation with the age of the infant; the quotient of pelvic rotation was more reliable after seven months of age (p < 0.0001). The errors of the measurement of the symphysis os-ischium angle tended to increase with age and those of the measurement of the index of pelvic tilt decreased with skeletal maturation (p = 0.002).






(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General