Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lizaur, A.
Right arrow Articles by Cebrian, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lizaur, A.
Right arrow Articles by Cebrian, R.

PREOPERATIVE FACTORS INFLUENCING THE RANGE OF MOVEMENT AFTER TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY FOR SEVERE OSTEOARTHRITIS

A. Lizaur, MD, Head, Orthopaedic Surgery Service; L. Marco, MD, Senior Orthopaedic Surgeon; and R. Cebrian, MD, Orthopaedic Surgeon

Servicio Cirugia Ortopedica, Hospital General, 03600 Elda, Spain.

Correspondence should be sent to Dr A. Lizaur.

We report a prospective study, using multivariate analysis, of the factors which influence the range of movement after total knee arthroplasty in 74 patients with 83 arthroplasties at a mean follow-up of 23.6 months (12 to 41). All the patients had a diagnosis of osteoarthritis, a severely disabled knee with a Knee Society system score of less than 60, varus deformity, no previous surgery to the knee, identical prostheses implanted with a similar surgical technique, and no postoperative complications which may have affected the range of movement.

The most important factors which influenced the range of movement after arthroplasty were the preoperative range of flexion and the body-weight of the patient. There was a significant improvement in flexion and reduction of flexion contracture at each successive review up to 12 months after operation. Patients with restricted movement before operation showed a satisfactory gain at final review.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
T.-H. Kim, D.-H. Lee, and S.-I. Bin
The NexGen LPS-flex to the knee prosthesis at a minimum of three years
J Bone Joint Surg Br, October 1, 2008; 90-B(10): 1304 - 1310.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
Y.-H. Kim and J.-S. Kim
Total knee replacement for patients with ankylosed knees
J Bone Joint Surg Br, October 1, 2008; 90-B(10): 1311 - 1316.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
B. M. Hanratty, N. W. Thompson, R. K. Wilson, and D. E. Beverland
The influence of posterior condylar offset on knee flexion after total knee replacement using a cruciate-sacrificing mobile-bearing implant
J Bone Joint Surg Br, July 1, 2007; 89-B(7): 915 - 918.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
Y. Matsuda, Y. Ishii, H. Noguchi, and R. Ishii
Varus-valgus balance and range of movement after total knee arthroplasty
J Bone Joint Surg Br, June 1, 2005; 87-B(6): 804 - 808.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General