Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Joint Replacement Instrumentation Limited (JRI) Ad
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Strecker, W.
Right arrow Articles by Kinzl, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Strecker, W.
Right arrow Articles by Kinzl, L.

LENGTH AND TORSION OF THE LOWER LIMB

W. Strecker, MD; P. Keppler, MD; F. Gebhard, MD; and L. Kinzl, MD, Professor

Department of Traumatology Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Ulm, Steinhovelstrasse 9, D-89070 Ulm, Germany.

Correspondence should be sent to Dr W. Strecker.

Corrective osteotomies are often planned and performed on the basis of normal anatomical proportions. We have evaluated the length and torsion of the segments of the lower limb in normal individuals, to analyse the differences between left and right sides, and to provide tolerance figures for both length and torsion.

We used CT on 355 adult patients and measured length and torsion by the Ulm method. We excluded all patients with evidence of trauma, infection, tumour or any congenital disorder.

The mean length of 511 femora was 46.3 ± 6.4 cm (±2SD) and of 513 tibiae 36.9 ± 5.6 cm; the mean total length of 378 lower limbs was 83.2 ± 11.4 cm with a tibiofemoral ratio of 1 to 1.26 ± 0.1. The 99th percentile level for length difference in 178 paired femora was 1.2 cm, in 171 paired tibiae 1.0 cm and in 60 paired lower limbs 1.4 cm.

In 505 femora the mean internal torsion was 24.1 ± 17.4°, and in 504 tibiae the mean external torsion was 34.9 ± 15.9°. For 352 lower limbs the mean external torsion was 9.8 ± 11.4°. The mean torsion angle of right and left femora in individuals did not differ significantly, but mean tibial torsion showed a significant difference between right (36.46° of external torsion) and left sides (33.07° of external torsion). For the whole legs torsion on the left was 7.5 ± 18.2° and 11.8 ± 18.8°, respectively (p < 0.001). There was a trend to greater internal torsion in femora in association with an increased external torsion in tibiae, but we found no correlation. The 99th percentile value for the difference in 172 paired femora was 13°; in 176 pairs of tibiae it was 14.3° and for 60 paired lower limbs 15.6°.

These results will help to plan corrective osteotomies in the lower limbs, and we have re-evaluated the mathematical limits of differences in length and torsion.






(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General