Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Joint Replacement Instrumentation Limited (JRI) Ad
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pazzaglia, U. E.
Right arrow Articles by Di Nucci, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pazzaglia, U. E.
Right arrow Articles by Di Nucci, A.

THE EFFECTS OF MECHANICAL FORCES ON BONES AND JOINTS

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON THE RAT TAIL

U. E. Pazzaglia, MD, Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery

2 Divisione di Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Spedali Civili, 1-25125 Brescia, Italy.

L. Andrini, MD, Registrar

Clinica Ortopedica, Universita’ di Pavia, 1-21100 Varese, Italy.

A. Di Nucci, BiolD, Researcher

Istituto di Farmacologia II, Universita’ di Pavia, Italy.

Correspondence should be sent to Professor U. E. Pazzaglia.

We have used an experimental model employing the bent tail of rats to investigate the effects of mechanical forces on bones and joints. Mechanical strain could be applied to the bones and joints of the tail without direct surgical exposure or the application of pins and wires.

The intervertebral disc showed stretched annular lamellae on the convex side, while the annulus fibrosus on the concave side was pinched between the inner corners of the vertebral epiphysis. In young rats with an active growth plate, a transverse fissure appeared at the level of the hypertrophic cell layer or the primary metaphyseal trabecular zone. Metaphyseal and epiphyseal trabeculae on the compressed side were thicker and more dense than those of the distracted part of the vertebra.

In growing animals, morphometric analysis of hemiepiphyseal and hemimetaphyseal areas, and the corresponding trabecular bone density, showed significant differences between the compressed and distracted sides. No differences were observed in adult rats. We found no significant differences in osteoclast number between compressed and distracted sides in either age group. Our results provide quantitative evidence of the working of ‘Wolff’s law’.

The differences in trabecular density are examples of remodelling by osteoclasts and osteoblasts; our finding of no significant difference in osteoclast numbers between the hemiepiphyses in the experimental and control groups suggests that the response of living bone to altered strain is mediated by osteoblasts.






(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General