Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Joint Replacement Instrumentation Limited (JRI) Ad
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Masterson, E. L.
Right arrow Articles by Gross, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Masterson, E. L.
Right arrow Articles by Gross, M.

THE CEMENT MANTLE IN FEMORAL IMPACTION ALLOGRAFTING

A COMPARISON OF THREE SYSTEMS FROM FOUR CENTRES

E. L. Masterson, FRCS, Orth, Former Fellow

Division of Reconstructive Orthopaedics

B. A. Masri, FRCS C, Clinical Assistant Professor and Head

Division of Reconstructive Orthopaedics

C. P. Duncan, FRCS C, Professor and Head

The University of British Columbia, Department of Orthopaedics, 3rd Floor, 910 West 10th Avenue, Room 3415, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V5Z 4E3.

A. Rosenberg, MD, Associate Professor

1063-1725 West Harrison Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60612, USA.

M. Cabanela, MD, Professor

Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.

M. Gross, MD, Associate Professor

Victoria General Hospital, 4135, ACC, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3H 2Y9.

Correspondence should be sent to Professor C. P. Duncan.

An analysis of the cement mantle obtained with the Exeter impaction allografting system at one centre showed that it was either deficient or absent in almost 47% of Gruen zones. We therefore examined the mantle obtained using this system at another hospital and compared the results with those from the CPT and Harris Precoat Systems at other centres.

The surgical indications for the procedure and the patient details were broadly similar in all four hospitals. There was some variation in the frequency of use of cortical strut allografts, cerclage wires and wire mesh to supplement the impaction allograft. Analysis of the cement mantles showed that when uncertain Gruen zones were excluded, the incidence of zones with areas of absence or deficiency of the cement was 47% and 50%, respectively, for the two centres using the Exeter system, 21% for the CPT system and 18% for the Harris Precoat system.

We measured the difference in size between the proximal allograft impactors and the definitive prosthesis for each system. The Exeter system impactors are shorter than the definitive prosthesis and taper sharply so that the cavity created is inadequate, especially distally. The CPT proximal impactors are considerably longer than the definitive prosthesis and are designed to give a mantle of approximately 2 mm medially and laterally and 1.5 mm anteriorly and posteriorly. The Harris Precoat proximal impactors allow for a mantle with a circumference of 0.75 mm in the smaller sizes and 1 mm in the larger.

Many reports link the longevity of a cemented implant to the adequacy of the cement mantle. For this reason, femoral impaction systems require careful design to achieve a cement mantle which is uninterrupted in its length and adequate in its thickness. Our results suggest that some current systems require modification.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
P. J. Wraighte and P. W. Howard
Femoral impaction bone allografting with an Exeter cemented collarless, polished, tapered stem in revision hip replacement: A MEAN FOLLOW-UP OF 10.5 YEARS
J Bone Joint Surg Br, August 1, 2008; 90-B(8): 1000 - 1004.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General