Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clatworthy, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Hardy, A. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clatworthy, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Hardy, A. E.

Reamed versus unreamed femoral nails

A RANDOMISED, PROSPECTIVE TRIAL

M. G. Clatworthy, FRACS, Registrar1; D. I. Clark, FRCS, Registrar2; D. H. Gray, ChM, MMedSc, FRACS, Professor of Orthopaedics2; and A. E. Hardy, FRACS, Clinical Director of Orthopaedics1

1 Auckland Hospital, Park Road, Auckland 1, New Zealand.
2 Middlemore Hospital, Golf Road, Auckland 6, New Zealand.

Correspondence should be sent to Dr M. G. Clatworthy at 34 Manawa Road, Remuera, Auckland 5, New Zealand.

We performed a randomised, prospective trial to evaluate the use of unreamed titanium nails for femoral fractures. Of 48 patients with 50 femoral fractures 45 were followed to union; 23 with an unreamed and 22 with a reamed nail. The study was stopped early because of a high rate of implant failure.

The fractures in the unreamed group were slower to unite (39.4 weeks) than those in the reamed group (28.5 weeks; p = 0.007). The time to union was over nine months in 57% of the unreamed group and in 18% of the reamed group.

In the unreamed group 14 secondary procedures were required in ten patients to enhance healing compared with three in three patients in the reamed group. Six implants (13%) failed, three in each group. Four of these six fractures showed evidence of delayed union.

To achieve quicker union and fewer implant failures we recommend the use of reamed nails of at least 12 mm in diameter for female patients and 13 mm in males.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
T. O. Hammer, R. Wieling, J. M. Green, N. P. Sudkamp, E. Schneider, and C. A. Muller
Effect of re-implanted particles from intramedullary reaming on mechanical properties and callus formation: A LABORATORY STUDY
J Bone Joint Surg Br, November 1, 2007; 89-B(11): 1534 - 1538.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
P. V. Giannoudis, C. Papakostidis, and C. Roberts
A review of the management of open fractures of the tibia and femur
J Bone Joint Surg Br, March 1, 2006; 88-B(3): 281 - 289.
[Full Text] [PDF]


(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General