Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gschwend, N.
Right arrow Articles by Baehler, A. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gschwend, N.
Right arrow Articles by Baehler, A. R.

Long-term results of the GSB III elbow arthroplasty

N. Gschwend, MD, Professor of Orthopaedics; and N. H. Scheier, MD, Professor of Orthopaedics

Schulthess Clinic, Lengghalde 2, CH-8008 Zürich, Switzerland.

A. R. Baehler

Engineering, Kapfsteig 44 A, CH-8032 Zürich, Switzerland.

Correspondence should be sent to Professor N. Gschwend.

Between 1978 and 1986, 59 patients received a GSB III elbow prosthesis, six of them in both elbows. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) was the underlying cause in 51 of the patients and post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) in eight. Of these, 24 patients (28 prostheses) have since died; two, both operated on bilaterally, had had their implants for more than ten years and had already been assessed for inclusion in the long-term follow-up. Two patients, each with one elbow prosthesis, have been lost to follow-up and three males who are still living (two with PTOA, one with juvenile RA) had their prosthesis removed before ten years had elapsed.

The remaining 32 patients (28 RA, 4 PTOA) with 36 GSB III elbows were examined clinically and radiologically after a mean period of 13.5 years. Pain was considerably reduced in 91.6%. Mobility was increased by 37° in those with RA and by 67° in those with PTOA.

There were three cases of aseptic loosening and three of deep infection. The main complication was disassembly of the prosthetic component in nine elbows (13.8%). This last group included two patients with postoperative fractures unrelated to the operative technique and one with neuropathic arthritis. Ulnar neuritis occurred in two patients.

Since 87.7% of all the GSB III prostheses implanted in this period remained in situ, our results are comparable with those for hip and knee arthroplasty.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
M. Cesar, Y. Roussanne, F. Bonnel, and F. Canovas
GSB III total elbow replacement in rheumatoid arthritis
J Bone Joint Surg Br, March 1, 2007; 89-B(3): 330 - 334.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
J. M. Aldridge III, N. R. Lightdale, W. J. Mallon, and R. W. Coonrad
Total elbow arthroplasty with the Coonrad/Coonrad-Morrey prosthesis: A 10- TO 31-YEAR SURVIVAL ANALYSIS
J Bone Joint Surg Br, April 1, 2006; 88-B(4): 509 - 514.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
S. B. Sneftrup, S. L. Jensen, H. V. Johannsen, and J. O. Sojbjerg
Revision of failed total elbow arthroplasty with use of a linked implant
J Bone Joint Surg Br, January 1, 2006; 88-B(1): 78 - 83.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
C. P. Little, A. J. Graham, and A. J. Carr
Total elbow arthroplasty: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE IN THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE UNTIL THE END OF 2003
J Bone Joint Surg Br, April 1, 2005; 87-B(4): 437 - 444.
[Full Text] [PDF]



(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General