The effectiveness of turnbuckle splinting for elbow contracturesJ. J. Gelinas, MD, Orthopaedic Resident; K. J. Faber, MD, FRCS C, Assistant Professor; S. D. Patterson, FRCS C, Assistant Professor; and G. J. W. King, MD, MSc, FRCS C, Associate ProfessorHand and Upper Limb Centre, St Joseph’s Health Centre, University of Western Ontario, 268 Grosvenor Street, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 4L6. Correspondence should be sent to Dr G. J. W. King. We have treated 22 patients with an elbow contracture using a static progressive turnbuckle splint for a mean of 4.5 ± 1.8 months. All had failed to improve with supervised physiotherapy and splinting. The mean range of flexion before splintage was from 32 ± 10° to 108 ± 19° and afterwards from 26 ± 10° (p = 0.02) to 127 ± 12° (p = 0.0001). A total of 11 patients gained a ‘functional arc of movement,’ defined as at least 30° to 130°. In eight patients movement improved with turnbuckle splinting, but the functional arc was not achieved. Six of these were satisfied and did not wish to proceed with surgical treatment and two had release of the elbow contracture. In three patients movement did not improve with the use of the turnbuckle splint and one subsequently had surgical treatment. Our findings have shown that turnbuckle splinting is a safe and effective treatment which should be considered in patients whose established elbow contractures have failed to respond to conventional physiotherapy. This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
||||||||||||
