Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Joint Replacement Instrumentation Limited (JRI) Ad
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wainwright, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Carr, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wainwright, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Carr, A. J.

Interobserver and intraobserver variation in classification systems for fractures of the distal humerus

A. M. Wainwright, FRCS, Specialist Registrar1; J. R. Williams, DM, Senior Lecturer in Trauma Orthopaedic Surgery2; and A. J. Carr, ChM, Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon1

1 Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Windmill Road, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK.
2 The Medical School, University of Newcastle, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE2 4HH, UK.

Correspondence should be sent to Mr A. M. Wainwright at 30 Orchard Close, Thame, Oxfordshire OX9 3JR, UK.

We assessed the inter- and intraobserver variation in classification systems for fractures of the distal humerus. Three orthopaedic trauma consultants, three trauma registrars and three consultant musculoskeletal radiologists independently classified 33 sets of radiographs of such fractures on two occasions, each using three separate systems.

For interobserver variation, the Riseborough and Radin system produced ‘moderate’ agreement (kappa = 0.513), but half of the fractures were not classifiable by this system. For the complete AO system, agreement was ‘fair’ (kappa = 0.343), but if only AO type and group or AO type alone was used, agreement improved to ‘moderate’ and ‘substantial’, respectively (kappa = 0.52 and 0.66). Agreement for the system of Jupiter and Mehne was ‘fair’ (kappa = 0.295). Similar levels of intraobserver variation were found.

Systems of classification are useful in decision-making and evaluation of outcome only if there is agreement and consistency among observers. Our study casts doubt on these aspects of the systems currently available for fractures of the distal humerus.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
T. W. Axelrad, B. Steen, D. W. Lowenberg, W. R. Creevy, and T. A. Einhorn
Heterotopic ossification after the use of commercially available recombinant human bone morphogenetic proteins in four patients
J Bone Joint Surg Br, December 1, 2008; 90-B(12): 1617 - 1622.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
C. K. Yiannakopoulos, A. Chougle, A. Eskelinen, J. P. Hodgkinson, and G. Hartofilakidis
Inter- and intra-observer variability of the Crowe and Hartofilakidis classification systems for congenital hip disease in adults
J Bone Joint Surg Br, May 1, 2008; 90-B(5): 579 - 583.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General