Interobserver and intraobserver variation in classification systems for fractures of the distal humerusA. M. Wainwright, FRCS, Specialist Registrar1; J. R. Williams, DM, Senior Lecturer in Trauma Orthopaedic Surgery2; and A. J. Carr, ChM, Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon1
1 Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Windmill Road, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK. Correspondence should be sent to Mr A. M. Wainwright at 30 Orchard Close, Thame, Oxfordshire OX9 3JR, UK. We assessed the inter- and intraobserver variation in classification systems for fractures of the distal humerus. Three orthopaedic trauma consultants, three trauma registrars and three consultant musculoskeletal radiologists independently classified 33 sets of radiographs of such fractures on two occasions, each using three separate systems. For interobserver variation, the Riseborough and Radin system produced moderate agreement (kappa = 0.513), but half of the fractures were not classifiable by this system. For the complete AO system, agreement was fair (kappa = 0.343), but if only AO type and group or AO type alone was used, agreement improved to moderate and substantial, respectively (kappa = 0.52 and 0.66). Agreement for the system of Jupiter and Mehne was fair (kappa = 0.295). Similar levels of intraobserver variation were found. Systems of classification are useful in decision-making and evaluation of outcome only if there is agreement and consistency among observers. Our study casts doubt on these aspects of the systems currently available for fractures of the distal humerus. This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||



