This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal My Folders Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Tornetta, P. Articles by Tiburzi, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Tornetta, P., III Articles by Tiburzi, D.

Antegrade or retrograde reamed femoral nailing

A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMISED TRIAL

Boston Medical Centre, Dowling 2 North, 818 Harrison Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02118, USA.

Correspondence should be sent to Dr P. Tornetta III.

Retrograde femoral nailing is gaining in popularity. We report a prospective, randomised comparison of antegrade and retrograde procedures in 68 patients with 69 fractures of the femoral shaft. All nails were inserted after appropriate reaming. There was no difference in operating time, blood loss, technical complications, size of nail or reamer, or transfusion requirements. There were more problems of length and rotation using a retrograde technique on a radiolucent table than with an antegrade approach on a fracture table. All fractures in both groups healed and there was no difference in the time taken to achieve union. Although retrograde nailing is a promising technique the skills required need practice. A longer period of follow-up is necessary to determine whether there are long-term problems in the knee after such surgery.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. Katsoulis, C. Court-Brown, and P. V. Giannoudis Incidence and aetiology of anterior knee pain after intramedullary nailing of the femur and tibia J Bone Joint Surg Br, May 1, 2006; 88-B(5): 576 - 580. [Full Text] [PDF]