Fracture after distraction osteogenesisA. H. R. W. Simpson, FRCS, Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon, Clinical Reader; and J. Kenwright, FRCS, Nuffield Professor of Orthopaedic SurgeryNuffield Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK. Correspondence should be sent to Professor J. Kenwright. We reviewed 173 patients undergoing distraction osteogenesis to determine the incidence, location and timing of fractures occurring as a complication of the procedure. There were 17 fractures in 180 lengthened segments giving an overall rate of fracture of 9.4%. Unexpectedly, the pattern and location of the fractures were very variable; six were within the regenerate itself, six at the junction between the regenerate and the original bone and five at distant sites in the limb. Of those occurring in the regenerate, five were noted to be associated with compression and partial collapse of the regenerate. In three patients collapse and deformity developed gradually in the distracted segment over the six months after removal of the frame. The method of treatment of these fractures should be chosen to take into account multiple factors, which are additional and often different from those to be considered during management of acute traumatic injuries. Internal fixation appears to be most appropriate for displaced fractures, although in small children, or in those in whom there has been, or is, infection of the screw tracks, a new period of treatment using external fixation may be needed. Fixation by intramedullary nailing was associated with a risk of infection, even if screw tracks were assessed as healthy at the time of insertion of the nail. Internal fixation with the use of plates is safe for displaced, unstable fractures in children.
|
|
