Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yanni, O. N.
Right arrow Articles by Joshi, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yanni, O. N.
Right arrow Articles by Joshi, R.

The Roper-Tuke total elbow arthroplasty

4- TO 10-YEAR RESULTS OF AN UNCONSTRAINED PROSTHESIS

O. N. Yanni, FRCS Ed (Tr & Orth), Specialist Registrar1; C. B. D.’A. Fearn, TD, MA, FRCS, Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon1; S. C. Gallannaugh, MS, FRCS, Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon1; and R. Joshi, FRCS (Tr & Orth), Senior Registrar1

1 Guy’s & St Thomas’ Hospitals, St Thomas’ Street, London SE1 9RT, UK.

Correspondence should be sent to Mr O. N. Yanni at Benacre Lodge, Hurst Hill, Hothfield, nr Ashford, Kent TN26 1ER, UK.

We report the results of a series of 59 unconstrained total arthroplasties of the elbow after a mean follow-up of 6.5 years (4 to 10). All the patients had rheumatoid arthritis. The indication for surgery was pain in all but one. Outcome was assessed by the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI).

Of the 59 arthroplasties, two were lost to follow-up. Ten patients died, but as two of their arthroplasties were failures we included them in the results. The outcome in the remaining 49 was excellent in 26 (53%), good in 15 (31%), fair in one (2%) and poor or a failure in seven (14%). There was an improvement in the pain score (p < 0.001), movement (p < 0.001) and function (p < 0.001). Two patients developed instability, but neither required further surgery. There was a mean increase of 21° in flexion and of 7° in extension.

The overall rate of complications was 33.9%. Lesions of the ulnar nerve, one of which did not recover, occurred in four patients, deep infection in two and stiffness in five. The rates of complications were similar to those in recent reports of other elbow arthroplasties.

We carried out a radiological analysis of 39 arthroplasties which showed radiolucent lines around the humeral component in 22 and the ulnar component in 15. There were lower scores on the MEPI for those with radiolucent lines around the humeral component.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
C. P. Little, A. J. Graham, and A. J. Carr
Total elbow arthroplasty: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE IN THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE UNTIL THE END OF 2003
J Bone Joint Surg Br, April 1, 2005; 87-B(4): 437 - 444.
[Full Text] [PDF]



(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General