Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Joint Replacement Instrumentation Limited (JRI) Ad
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Westrich, G. H.
Right arrow Articles by Peterson, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Westrich, G. H.
Right arrow Articles by Peterson, M.

Meta-analysis of thromboembolic prophylaxis after total knee arthroplasty

G. H. Westrich, MD, Assistant Attending Orthopaedic Surgeon1; S. B. Haas, MD, Associate Attending Orthopaedic Surgeon1; P. Mosca, MD, Staff Anaesthesiologist2; and M. Peterson, PhD, Associate Scientist1

1 Hospital for Special Surgery, Cornell University Medical Centre, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA.
2 Capital Health Systems, Mercer Hospital, Trenton, New Jersey, USA.

Correspondence should be sent to Dr G. H. Westrich.

We performed a meta-analysis of the English literature to assess the efficacy of four common regimes for thromboembolic prophylaxis after total knee arthroplasty: aspirin, warfarin, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and pneumatic compression. We reviewed 136 articles and abstracts published between January 1980 and December 1997. Papers not using routine venography and a lung scan or angiography to detect deep-venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary emboli (PE) respectively, were excluded. Of the 136 studies, 23 with 6001 patients were selected.

The incidence of DVT was 53% (1701/3214) in the aspirin group, 45% (541/1203) in the warfarin group, 29% (311/1075) in the LMWH group, and 17% (86/509) in the pneumatic compression device group. Intermittent pneumatic compression devices and LMWH were significantly better than warfarin (p < 0.0001) or aspirin (p < 0.0001) in preventing DVT.

The incidence of asymptomatic PE was 11.7% in the aspirin group (222/1901), 8.2% (101/1229) in the warfarin group and 6.3% (24/378) in the pneumatic compression group. No studies with LMWH used routine lung scans. Warfarin and pneumatic compression were significantly better than aspirin in preventing asymptomatic PE (p < 0.05).

The incidence of symptomatic PE was 1.3% (23/1800) in the aspirin group, 0.4% (2/559) in the warfarin group, 0.5% (2/416) in the LMWH group and 0% (0/177) in the pneumatic compression group. No statistically significant difference was noted between the above prophylatic regimes due to the very small incidence of symptomatic PE.

Prophylaxis for thromboembolic disease in TKA may have to include a combination of some of the above regimes to incorporate their advantages.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
E. O. Pearse, B. F. Caldwell, R. J. Lockwood, and J. Hollard
Early mobilisation after conventional knee replacement may reduce the risk of postoperative venous thromboembolism
J Bone Joint Surg Br, March 1, 2007; 89-B(3): 316 - 322.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 NEJMHome page
S. Banarer, G. Schillaci, L. Pasqualini, E. Mannarino, M. Nishiguchi, N. Takamura, K. Aoyagi, C. W. Francis, S. D. Berkowitz, and C. W. Colwell Jr.
Ximelagatran versus Warfarin after Total Knee Replacement
N. Engl. J. Med., February 5, 2004; 350(6): 616 - 617.
[Full Text] [PDF]


(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General