Structural proximal femoral allografts for failed total hip replacementsA MINIMUM REVIEW OF FIVE YEARSF. S. Haddad, MCh Orth, FRCS Orth, Clinical Research Fellow1; D. S. Garbuz, MD, FRCS C, Clinical Assistant Professor1; B. A Masri, MD, FRCS C, Clinical Associate Professor1; and C. P. Duncan, MD, FRCS C, Professor11 Department of Orthopaedics, Laurel Pavilion, Vancouver General Hospital, Third Floor, 910 West Tenth Avenue, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V5Z 4E3. Correspondence should be sent to Professor C. P. Duncan. There are few medium- and long-term data on the outcome of the use of proximal femoral structural allografts in revision hip arthroplasty. This is a study of a consecutive series of 40 proximal femoral allografts performed for failed total hip replacements using the same technique with a minimum follow-up of five years (mean 8.8 years; range 5 to 11.5 years). In all cases the stem was cemented into both the allograft and the host femur. The proximal femur of the host was resected in 37 cases. There were four early revisions (10%), two for infection, one for nonunion of the allograft-host junction, and one for allograft resorption noted at the time of revision of a failed acetabular reconstruction. Junctional nonunion was seen in three patients (8%), two of whom were managed successfully by bone grafting, and bone grafting and plating respectively. Instability was observed in four (10%). Trochanteric nonunion was seen in 18 patients (46%) and trochanteric escape in ten of these (27%). The mean Harris hip score improved from 39 to 79. Severe resorption involving the full thickness of the allograft was seen in seven patients (17.5%). This progressed rapidly and silently, but has yet to cause failure of any of the reconstructions. Profound resorption of the allograft may be related to a combination of factors, including a slow form of immune rejection, stress shielding and resorption due to mechanical disuse with solid cemented distal fixation, and the absence of any masking or protective effect which may be provided by the retention of the bivalved host bone as a vascularised onlay autograft. Although continued surveillance is warranted, the very good medium-term clinical results justify the continued use of structural allografts for failed total hip replacements with severe loss of proximal femoral bone. This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
