Hangman’s fracture: the relationship between asymmetry and instabilityC. Samaha, MD, Chef de Clinique Assistant; and J. Y. Lazennec, MDMaître de Conference des Universités, Practicien Hospitalier C. Laporte, MD, Chef de Clinique Assistant; and G. Saillant, MD, Professeur, Chef de Service Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hôpital, Pierre et Marie Curie University, 83 Boulevard de l’Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France. Correspondence should be sent to Professor G. Saillant. There is ambiguity concerning the nomenclature and classification of fractures of the ring of the second cervical vertebra (C2). Disruption of the pars interarticularis which defines true traumatic spondylolisthesis of C2, is often wrongly called a pedicle fracture. Our aim in this study was to assess the influence of asymmetry on the anatomical and functional outcome and to evaluate the criteria of instability established by Roy-Camille et al. We studied the plain radiographs and CT scans of 24 patients: 13 were judged to be asymmetrical, ten were considered unstable and 14 stable. Treatment was with a Minerva jacket in 15 fractures and by operation in nine. Surgery was undertaken in patients with severe C2 to C3 sprains. One patient with an unstable lesion refused operation and was treated conservatively with a poor radiological result. Our study showed that asymmetry of the fracture did not affect the outcomes of treatment and should not therefore influence decisions in treatment. The criteria of Roy-Camille seem to be reliable and useful. We prefer the posterior approach to the cervical spine, which allows both stabilisation of the fracture and correction of a local kyphosis.
|
|
