This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal My Folders Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Martini, F. Articles by Sell, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Martini, F. Articles by Sell, S.

Precision of the measurements of periprosthetic bone mineral density in hips with a custom-made femoral stem

¹ Department of Orthopaedics
² Department of Sports Medicine, University Hospital of Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Strasse 3, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany.
³ Department of Hand Surgery, Rhoen-Klinikum, Salzburger Leite 1, D-97616 Bad Neustadt a.d.S., Germany.

Correspondence should be sent to Dr F. Martini.

Our aim was to determine the precision of the measurements of bone mineral density (BMD) by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in the proximal femur before and after implantation of an uncemented implant, with particular regard to the significance of retro- and prospective studies.

We examined 60 patients to determine the difference in preoperative BMD between osteoarthritic and healthy hips. The results showed a preoperative BMD of the affected hip which was lower by a mean of 4% and by a maximum of 9% compared with the opposite side. In addition, measurements were made in the operated hip before and at ten days after operation to determine the effect of the implantation of an uncemented custom-made femoral stem. The mean increase in the BMD was 8% and the maximum was 24%. Previous retrospective studies have reported a marked loss of BMD on the operated side.

The precision of double measurements using a special foot jig showed a modified coefficient of variation of 0.6% for the non-operated side in 15 patients and of 0.6% for the operated femur in 20 patients.

The effect of rotation on the precision of the measurements after implantation of an uncemented femoral stem was determined in ten explanted femora and for the operated side in ten patients at 10° rotation and in 20 patients at 30° rotation. Rotation within 30° influenced the precision in studies in vivo and in vitro by a mean of 3% and in single cases in up to 60%.

Precise prediction of the degree of loss of BMD is thus only possible in prospective cross-sectional measurements, since the effect of the difference in preoperative BMD, as well as the apparent increase in BMD after implantation of an uncemented stem, is not known from retrospective studies. The DEXA method is a reliable procedure for determining periprosthetic BMD when positioning and rotation are strictly controlled.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Y.-H. Kim, S.-H. Yoon, and J.-S. Kim Changes in the bone mineral density in the acetabulum and proximal femur after cementless total hip replacement: ALUMINA-ON-ALUMINA VERSUS ALUMINA-ON-POLYETHYLENE ARTICULATION J Bone Joint Surg Br, February 1, 2007; 89-B(2): 174 - 179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P.-A. Vendittoli, M. Lavigne, J. Girard, and A. G. Roy A randomised study comparing resection of acetabular bone at resurfacing and total hip replacement J Bone Joint Surg Br, August 1, 2006; 88-B(8): 997 - 1002. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				U. G. Leichtle, C. I. Leichtle, B. Schmidt, and F. Martini Peri-prosthetic bone density after implantation of a custom-made femoral component: A FIVE-YEAR FOLLOW-UP J Bone Joint Surg Br, April 1, 2006; 88-B(4): 467 - 471. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]