Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clark, D. I.
Right arrow Articles by Moran, C. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clark, D. I.
Right arrow Articles by Moran, C. G.

Cardiac output during hemiarthroplasty of the hip

A PROSPECTIVE, CONTROLLED TRIAL OF CEMENTED AND UNCEMENTED PROSTHESES

D. I. Clark, FRCS Orth, Orthopaedic Specialist; A. B. Ahmed, BMedSci, BM, BS, DCH, FRCA, Anaesthetic Specialist Registrar; B. R. Baxendale, FRCA, Consultant Anaesthetist; and C. G. Moran, MD, FRCS, Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon

Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH UK.

Correspondence should be sent to Mr D. I. Clark at The Old School House, Overlane, Hazelwood, Belper, Derbyshire DE56 4AG, UK.

In a prospective, controlled study, we measured the effect on cardiac output of the introduction of methylmethacrylate during hemiarthroplasty for displaced fractures of the femoral neck. We treated 20 elderly patients who were similar in age, height, weight and preoperative left ventricular function with either cemented or uncemented hemiarthroplasty. Using a transoesophageal Doppler probe, we measured cardiac output before incision and at six stages of the procedure: during the surgical approach, reaming and lavage of the femoral canal, the introduction of cement, the insertion of the prosthesis, and in reduction and closure.

We found that before the cement was introduced, there was no difference in stroke volume or cardiac output (p > 0.25). Cementation produced a transient but significant reduction in cardiac output of 33% (p < 0.01) and a reduction in stroke volume of 44% (p < 0.02). The introduction of cement did not affect the heart rate or mean arterial pressure. There was no significant difference in cardiac function on insertion of the prosthesis. Standard non-invasive haemodynamic monitoring did not detect the cardiovascular changes which may account for the sudden deaths that sometimes occur during cemented hemiarthroplasty.

The fall in stroke volume and cardiac output may be caused by embolism occurring during cementation, but there was no similar fall during reaming or insertion of the prosthesis.






(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General