Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 84-B, Issue 1, 23-29.
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.84B1.12034  
Copyright © 2002 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vossinakis, I. C.
Right arrow Articles by Badras, L. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vossinakis, I. C.
Right arrow Articles by Badras, L. S.

The external fixator compared with the sliding hip screw for pertrochanteric fractures of the femur

I. C. Vossinakis, MD, Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon

Weston General Hospital, Grange Road, Uphill, Weston-super-Mare, Somerset BS23 4TQ, UK.

L. S. Badras, PhD, Head

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Volos General Hospital, 134 Polymeri Street, 382 21 Volos, Greece.

Correspondence should be sent to Mr I. C. Vossinakis at 58 Ferndene, Bradley Stoke, Bristol BS32 9DF, UK.

In a prospective, randomised study we have compared the pertrochanteric external fixator (PF) with the sliding hip screw (SHS) in 100 consecutive patients who were allocated randomly to the two methods of treatment. Details of the patients and the patterns of fracture were similar in both groups. Follow-up was for six months.

Use of the PF was associated with significantly less blood loss, a shorter operating time, reduced postoperative pain, shorter hospitalisation (p < 0.001), earlier mobilisation (p < 0.001) and a reduced rate of mechanical complications (p < 0.01). Superficial infection was significantly more common with the PF (p < 0.01), but without long-term adverse consequences. There were no differences in the healing of the fracture, mortality or final functional outcome. Our results indicate that the external fixator is an effective and safe device for treating pertrochanteric fractures and should be considered as a useful alternative to conventional fixation with the sliding hip screw.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
N. K. Karn, G. K. Singh, P. Kumar, B. Shrestha, M. P. Singh, and M. J. Gowda
Comparison between external fixation and sliding hip screw in the management of trochanteric fracture of the femur in Nepal
J Bone Joint Surg Br, October 1, 2006; 88-B(10): 1347 - 1350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General