Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 84-B, Issue 1, 83-87.
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.84B1.11951  
Copyright © 2002 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nagels, J.
Right arrow Articles by Rozing, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nagels, J.
Right arrow Articles by Rozing, P. M.

Patterns of loosening of the glenoid component

J. Nagels, MD, PhD, Student; E. R. Valstar, PhD, Post-doctoral Researcher; M. Stokdijk, MSc, PhD, Student; and P. M. Rozing, MD, PhD, Professor of Orthopaedics, Head of Department

Orthopaedic Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Centre, B0-57 PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands.

Correspondence should be sent to Dr J. Nagels.

The incidence of loosening of a cemented glenoid componentin total shoulder arthroplasty, detected by means of radiolucent lines or positional shift of the component on true anteroposterior radiographs, has been reported to be between 0% and 44%. Radiolucent lines are, however, difficult to detect and to interpret because of the mobility of the shoulder girdle and the obliquity of the glenoid which hinder standardisation of radiographs. We examined radiolucencies around cemented glenoid components in 48 patients, with a mean follow-up of 5.3 years, and found progressive changes to be present predominantly at the inferior pole of the component. This may hold a clue for the mechanism of loosening of this implant.

In five patients we performed an additional analysis of loosening of the glenoid component using digital roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA). After three years, three of the five implants had loosened (migration 1.2 to 5.5 mm). In only one, with gross loosening, were the radiological signs consistent with the RSA findings.

When traditional radiographs are used for assessment, the rate of early loosening is underestimated. We recommend that RSA be used for this.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
D. Nuttall, J. F. Haines, and I. A. Trail
The effect of the offset humeral head on the micromovement of pegged glenoid components: A COMPARATIVE STUDY USING RADIOSTEREOMETRIC ANALYSIS
J Bone Joint Surg Br, June 1, 2009; 91-B(6): 757 - 761.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
P. Boileau, R. J. Sinnerton, C. Chuinard, and G. Walch
Arthroplasty of the shoulder
J Bone Joint Surg Br, May 1, 2006; 88-B(5): 562 - 575.
[Full Text] [PDF]



(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General