Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 84-B, Issue 2, 178-182.
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.84B2.12324  
Copyright © 2002 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cook, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Gillespie, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cook, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Gillespie, I.

The role of angiography in the management of haemorrhage from major fractures of the pelvis

R. E. Cook, FRCS Ed, Specialist Registrar; and J. F. Keating, MPhil, FRCS Ed, Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon

Edinburgh Orthopaedic Trauma Unit

I. Gillespie, FRCR, Consultant Radiologist

Department of Radiology, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Lauriston Place, Edinburgh EH3 9YY, UK.

Correspondence should be sent to Mr J. F. Keating.

In a series of 150 consecutive patients with unstable fractures of the pelvis, angiography was performed in 23 (15%) who had uncontrolled hypotension. There were three anteroposterior compression (APC), eight lateral compression (LC) and 12 vertical shear (VS) injuries. Arterial sources of haemorrhage were identified in 18 (78%) patients and embolisation was performed. Angiography was required in 28% of VS injuries. The morphology of the fracture was not a reliable guide to the associated vascular injury. Ten (43%) patients died, of whom six had had angiography as the first therapeutic intervention. Five of these had a fracture which was associated with an increase in pelvic volume (APC or VS) which could have been stabilised by an external fixator. Based on our findings we recommend skeletal stabilisation and, if indicated, laparotomy to deal with sources of intraperitoneal blood loss before pelvic angiography. Embolisation of pelvic arterial bleeding is a worthwhile procedure in patients with hypotension which is unresponsive to these interventions.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
A. B. van Vugt and A. van Kampen
An unstable pelvic ring: THE KILLING FRACTURE
J Bone Joint Surg Br, April 1, 2006; 88-B(4): 427 - 433.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
R. E. M. O'Sullivan, T. O. White, and J. F. Keating
Major pelvic fractures: IDENTIFICATION OF PATIENTS AT HIGH RISK
J Bone Joint Surg Br, April 1, 2005; 87-B(4): 530 - 533.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General