Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 84-B, Issue 2, 220-222.
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.84B2.12568  
Copyright © 2002 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Palmer, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Cross, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Palmer, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Cross, M. J.

Ability to kneel after total knee replacement

S. H. Palmer, FRCS (Trauma & Orth), Locum Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon

Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Windmill Road, Headington, Oxford OX3 74D, UK.

C. T. Servant, FRCS, Knee Fellow; J. Maguire, FRACS Ortho, Knee Fellow; E. N. Parish, BHSc, HM, Research Assistant; and M. J. Cross, OAM, MD, FRACS, Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon

The Australian Institute of Musculo-Skeletal Research, 286 Pacific Highway, Crows Nest, New South Wales, Australia 2065.

Correspondence should be sent to Mr S. H. Palmer at 3 Mark Road, Headington, Oxford OX3 8PB, UK.

We have investigated the ability to kneel after total knee replacement. We asked 75 patients (100 knees) at least six months after routine uncemented primary total knee replacement, to comment on and to demonstrate their ability to kneel. Differences between the perceived and actual ability to kneel were noted. In 32 knees patients stated that they could kneel without significant discomfort. In 54 knees patients avoided kneeling because of uncertainties or recommendations from third parties (doctors, nursing staff, friends, etc). A total of 64 patients was actually able to kneel without discomfort or with mild discomfort only and 12 of the remainder were unable to kneel because of problems which were not related to the knee. Twenty-four patients therefore were unable to kneel because of discomfort in the knee.

There was no difference between the ‘kneelers’ and ‘non-kneelers’ with regard to overall knee score, range of movement and the presence of patellar resurfacing.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
B. Jeffcote, R. Nicholls, A. Schirm, and M. S. Kuster
The variation in medial and lateral collateral ligament strain and tibiofemoral forces following changes in the flexion and extension gaps in total knee replacement: A LABORATORY EXPERIMENT USING CADAVER KNEES
J Bone Joint Surg Br, November 1, 2007; 89-B(11): 1528 - 1533.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
M. J. Cross and E. N. Parish
A hydroxyapatite-coated total knee replacement: PROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF 1000 PATIENTS
J Bone Joint Surg Br, August 1, 2005; 87-B(8): 1073 - 1076.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
P. B. Pynsent, D. J. Adams, and S. P. Disney
The Oxford hip and knee outcome questionnaires for arthroplasty: OUTCOMES AND STANDARDS FOR SURGICAL AUDIT
J Bone Joint Surg Br, February 1, 2005; 87-B(2): 241 - 248.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General