This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal My Folders Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ridgeway, S. R. Articles by Engh, G. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ridgeway, S. R. Articles by Engh, G. A.

The effect of alignment of the knee on the outcome of unicompartmental knee replacement

The Anderson Clinic Post-graduate Medical Education Foundation

D. J. Ammeen, BS, Research Project Director; and G. A. Engh, MD, Director of Knee Research

The Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute, Suite 200, 2501 Parker’s Lane, Alexandria, Virginia 22306, USA.

Correspondence should be sent to Miss D. J. Ammeen.

Many authors have recommended undercorrection of the deformity when carrying out unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). The isolated effect of alignment of the knee on the outcome of UKA has, however, received little attention.

We reviewed 185 UKAs at a minimum of five years after surgery. They had been carried out by a single surgeon using metal-backed tibial components in the management of arthritis of the medial compartment. We measured the tibiofemoral angle (TFA) before and at four months after operation and at the most recent assessment. The amount of correction of the TFA and any subsequent loss were recorded.

While adjusting for the effects of age, weight and gender of the patients and the type and thickness of the implants, the mean correction was significantly less for those with a Marmor rating of failure (6.8°) than for those rated excellent (9.2°). The mean correction was also significantly less for patients with a Marmor rating of failure (6.8°) than for those rated poor (11.1°). The mean correction for the UKAs which were revised (6.6°) was significantly less than for those not revised (9.1°). Additionally, revised UKAs had a significantly higher percentage (63%) of thinner tibial implants (<8 mm) than the surviving UKAs (27%). These findings suggest that undercorrection of the TFA in UKA of the medial compartment should be avoided, particularly if a thin tibial polyethylene insert is used.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Gulati, H. Pandit, C. Jenkins, R. Chau, C. A. F. Dodd, and D. W. Murray The effect of leg alignment on the outcome of unicompartmental knee replacement J Bone Joint Surg Br, April 1, 2009; 91-B(4): 469 - 474. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Keene, D. Simpson, and Y. Kalairajah Limb alignment in computer-assisted minimally-invasive unicompartmental knee replacement J Bone Joint Surg Br, January 1, 2006; 88-B(1): 44 - 48. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]