Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 84-B, Issue 5, 748-752.
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.84B5.11841  
Copyright © 2002 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Berlemann, U.
Right arrow Articles by Heini, P. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Berlemann, U.
Right arrow Articles by Heini, P. F.

Adjacent vertebral failure after vertebroplasty

A BIOMECHANICAL INVESTIGATION

U. Berlemann, MD1; S. J. Ferguson, PhD2; L.-P. Nolte, PhD2; and P. F. Heini, MD1

1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Spine Service, Inselspital Bern, Freiburgstrasse, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland.
2 M. E. Müller Institute for Biomechanics, University of Bern, Murtenstrasse 35, PB 30, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland.

Correspondence should be sent to Dr S. J. Ferguson.

Vertebroplasty, which is the percutaneous injection of bone cement into vertebral bodies has recently been used to treat painful osteoporotic compression fractures. Early clinical results have been encouraging, but very little is known about the consequences of augmentation with cement for the adjacent, non-augmented level.

We therefore measured the overall failure, strength and structural stiffness of paired osteoporotic two-vertebra functional spine units (FSUs). One FSU of each pair was augmented with polymethyl-methacrylate bone cement in the caudal vertebra, while the other served as an untreated control.

Compared with the controls, the ultimate failure load for FSUs treated by injection of cement was lower. The geometric mean treated/untreated ratio of failure load was 0.81, with 95% confidence limits from 0.70 to 0.92, (p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in overall FSU stiffness. For treated FSUs, there was a trend towards lower failure loads with increased filling with cement (r2 = 0.262, p = 0.13).

The current practice of maximum filling with cement to restore the stiffness and strength of a vertebral body may provoke fractures in adjacent, non-augmented vertebrae. Further investigation is required to determine an optimal protocol for augmentation.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
A. G. Hadjipavlou, M. N. Tzermiadianos, P. G. Katonis, and M. Szpalski
Percutaneous vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures and osteolytic tumours
J Bone Joint Surg Br, December 1, 2005; 87-B(12): 1595 - 1604.
[Full Text] [PDF]



(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General