Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 84-B, Issue 6, 817-824.
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.84B6.12837  
Copyright © 2002 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schneider, W.
Right arrow Articles by Knahr, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schneider, W.
Right arrow Articles by Knahr, K.

Intertrochanteric osteotomy for avascular necrosis of the head of the femur

SURVIVAL PROBABILITY OF TWO DIFFERENT METHODS

W. Schneider, MD, Senior Resident; N. Aigner, MD, Resident; O. Pinggera, MD, Resident; and K. Knahr, MD, Professor and Head of Department

Second General Orthopaedic Department, Orthopaedic Hospital Vienna-Speising, Speisingerstrasse 109, A-1134 Vienna, Austria.

Correspondence should be sent to Dr W. Schneider.

We have compared different types of intertrochanteric osteotomy for avascular of necrosis of the hip and evaluated their performance in the light of improving outcome after total hip arthroplasty (THA). During a period of 14 years we performed 63 flexion osteotomies (partly combined with varus or valgus displacement), 29 rotational osteotomies, 13 varus osteotomies, eight medialising osteotomies and two extension osteotomies. The mean period of follow-up for all 115 operations was 7.3 years (maximum 24.6).

At follow-up, 27 of 29 patients with a rotational osteotomy had already undergone a THA, compared with 36 of 63 after flexion osteotomy. A high incidence of complications (55.2%) was seen early after rotational osteotomy, compared with 17.5% after flexion osteotomy.

For all osteotomies there was a high correlation between the size of the necrotic area and the incidence of failure, which also correlated with the preoperative Ficat and Steinberg stages. Using Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis, Sugioka’s rotational osteotomy showed a survival probability after five years of 0.26 (95% confidence interval 0.49 to 0.14), and after ten years of 0.15 (CI 0.36 to 0.06). The survival probability for flexion osteotomy was 0.70 (CI 0.83 to 0.59) after five years and 0.50 (CI 0.65 to 0.38) after ten years. The subgroup of flexion osteotomy with a necrotic sector of less than 180° achieved the best survival probability of 0.90 (CI 1.00 to 0.80) after five years and 0.61 (CI 0.84 to 0.45) after ten years.

The indications for intertrochanteric osteotomy for avascular necrosis of the hip have to be addressed critically. Even flexion osteotomy in cases with small areas of necrosis provides only temporary benefit. Rotational osteotomy was associated with a high incidence of complications.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
A. Petrie
Statistics in orthopaedic papers
J Bone Joint Surg Br, September 1, 2006; 88-B(9): 1121 - 1136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General