|
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 84-B, Issue 6,
825-831.
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.84B6.13004 Copyright © 2002 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery Migration of the femoral stem after impaction bone graftingFIRST RESULTS OF AN ONGOING, RANDOMISED STUDY OF THE EXETER AND ELITE PLUS FEMORAL STEMS USING RADIOSTEREOMETRIC ANALYSISW. J. van Doorn, MD1; B. L. E. F. ten Have, MD1; F. C. van Biezen, MD, Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon1; W. C. J. Hop, PhD, Statistician1; A. Z. Ginai, MD, PhD, Radiologist1; and J. A. N. Verhaar, MD, PhD, Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery11 Department of Orthopaedics, Dijkzigt Hospital, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands Correspondence should be sent to Dr F. C. van Biezen. We report the initial results of an ongoing randomised, prospective study on migration of the Exeter and Elite Plus femoral stems after impaction allografting, as measured by radiostereometry. Clinically, the impaction technique gave good results for both stems. The mean subsidence in the first year was 1.30 mm and 0.20 mm for the Exeter and the Elite Plus stems, respectively. In the second year, the Exeter stem continued to subside further by a mean of 0.42 mm, while the Elite Plus stem did not do so. Subsidence of the Exeter stem correlated with deficiency of bone stock as graded on the Gustilo and Pasternak scale. This correlation was not found for the Elite Plus stem. None of the other parameters which were studied predisposed to subsidence. There was no significant association between the amount of subsidence and the radiological appearance of the graft for either stem. Our findings do not support the theory that radial compression, due to subsidence of the Exeter stem, is the essential stimulus for remodelling in impaction allografting. This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||



