This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal My Folders Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Holen, K. J. Articles by Terjesen, T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Holen, K. J. Articles by Terjesen, T.

Universal or selective screening of the neonatal hip using ultrasound?

A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMISED TRIAL OF 15 529 NEWBORN INFANTS

¹ Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
² Department of Surgery
³ National Centre for Fetal Medicine and Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Trondheim, N-7006 Trondheim, Norway.
⁴ Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The National Hospital, N-0027 Oslo, Norway.

Correspondence should be sent to Dr K. J. Holen.

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether universal (all neonates) or selective (neonates belonging to the risk groups) ultrasound screening of the hips should be recommended at birth.

We carried out a prospective, randomised trial between 1988 and 1992, including all newborn infants at our hospital. A total of 15 529 infants was randomised to either clinical screening and ultrasound examination of all hips or clinical screening of all hips and ultrasound examination only of those at risk. The effect of the screening was assessed by the rate of late detection of congenital or developmental hip dysplasia in the two groups.

During follow-up of between six and 11 years, only one late-detected hip dysplasia was seen in the universal group, compared with five in the subjective group, representing a rate of 0.13 and 0.65 per 1000, respectively. The difference in late detection between the two groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.22).

When clinical screening is of high quality, as in our study, the effect of an additional ultrasound examination, measured as late-presenting hip dysplasia, is marginal. Under such circumstances, we consider that universal ultrasound screening is not necessary, but recommend selective ultrasound screening for neonates with abnormal or suspicious clinical findings and those with risk factors for hip dysplasia.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. W. Paton, K. Hinduja, and C. D. Thomas The significance of at-risk factors in ultrasound surveillance of developmental dysplasia of the hip: A TEN-YEAR PROSPECTIVE STUDY J Bone Joint Surg Br, September 1, 2005; 87-B(9): 1264 - 1266. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. W. PATON, H. MUMTAZ, and T. WIRTH Evolution of late presenting developmental dysplasia of the hip and associated surgical procedures after 14 years of neonatal ultrasound screening J Bone Joint Surg Br, January 1, 2005; 87-B(1): 135 - 136. [Full Text] [PDF]