Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 84-B, Issue 6, 915-919.
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.84B6.12111  
Copyright © 2002 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bechtold, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Søballe, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bechtold, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Søballe, K.

Bone ingrowth in the presence of particulate polyethylene

SYNERGY BETWEEN INTERFACE MOTION AND PARTICULATE POLYETHYLENE IN PERIPROSTHETIC TISSUE RESPONSE

J. E. Bechtold, PhD, Director

Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Midwest Orthopaedic and Minneapolis Medical Research Foundations

V. Kubic, MD, Medical Staff

Department of Pathology
Hennepin County Medical Centre, 914 South Eighth Street, 860C Minneapolis, Minnesota 55404, USA.

K. Søballe, MD, PhD, Professor

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus Amtsyggehus, Tage-Hansens Gade, Aarhus C, Denmark.

Correspondence should be sent to Dr J. E. Bechtold.

We have investigated whether the presence of polyethylene (PE) alone is sufficient to cause an aggressive periprosthetic tissue response, or whether certain mechanical interface conditions can allow bone to grow while in the presence of PE. An experimental implant was loaded in the presence and absence of particulate PE under stable and unstable conditions.

Bone with a thin, discontinuous fibrous membrane formed in both groups of stable implants, either in the presence or absence of PE. By contrast, a continuous fibrous membrane consistently formed in both groups of unstable implants. The membrane consisted of loose fibrous connective tissue when PE was absent, and dense connective tissue with macrophages and a synovial lining when PE was present. In this model, if the interface was stable, the presence of PE was not sufficient to prevent the formation of bone or to produce a phagocytic tissue response. Only when the interface was unstable did a fibrous membrane form, and only then in the presence of PE.






(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General