Logo of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (Br)
Quick search:        
          Advanced Search
Guest Access | Sign In
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 84-B, Issue 7, 1040-1045.
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.84B7.12948  
Copyright © 2002 by British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Postacchini, F.
Right arrow Articles by Cinotti, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Postacchini, F.
Right arrow Articles by Cinotti, G.

Recovery of motor deficits after microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation

F. Postacchini, MD, Professor and Chairman; G. Giannicola, MD, Orthopaedic Surgeon; and G. Cinotti, MD, Assistant Professor

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University La Sapienza, Piazzale le Aldo Moro 5, 00187 Rome, Italy.

Correspondence should be sent to Professor F. Postacchini.

We have studied, prospectively, 116 patients with motor deficits associated with herniation of a lumbar disc who underwent microdiscectomy. They were studied during the first six months and at a mean of 6.4 years after surgery. Before operation, muscle weakness was mild (grade 4) in 67% of patients, severe (grade 3) in 21% and very severe (grade 2 or 1) in 12%. The muscle which most frequently had severe or very severe weakness was extensor hallucis longus, followed in order by triceps surae, extensor digitorum communis, tibialis anterior, and others.

At the latest follow-up examination, 76% of patients had complete recovery of strength. Persistent weakness was found in 16% of patients who had had a mild preoperative deficit and in 39% of those with severe or very severe weakness. Muscle strength was graded 4 in all patients with persistent weakness, except for four with a very severe preoperative deficit affecting the L5 or S1 nerve root. They showed no significant recovery. Excluding this last group, the degree of recovery of motor function was inversely related to the preoperative severity and duration of muscle weakness. The patients’ subjective functional capacity was not directly related to the degree of recovery except in those with persistent severe or very severe deficit.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
R. W. Marshall
The functional relevance of neurological recovery 20 years or more after lumbar discectomy
J Bone Joint Surg Br, May 1, 2008; 90-B(5): 554 - 555.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
M. Mariconda, O. Galasso, V. Secondulfo, A. Cozzolino, and C. Milano
The functional relevance of neurological recovery after lumbar discectomy: A FOLLOW-UP OF MORE THAN 20 YEARS
J Bone Joint Surg Br, May 1, 2008; 90-B(5): 622 - 628.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



(c) British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery All Rights Reserved
Registered charity no: 209299     Print ISSN: 0301-620X
Hip, Knee, Trauma, Upper limb, Foot & Ankle, Paediatrics, Oncology, Spine, Arthroplasty, General